AWS Fargate Reviews

user reviews

AWS Fargate has received both positive and negative reviews. This article will explore the following:


Table of Contents

Achieve Cloud Elasticity with Iron

Enterprises are moving off AWS Fargate to IronWorker to manage their containers. Speak to us to talk about why.

AWS Fargate Reviews

AWS Fargate is still a relatively new player having entered the market in 2017. But many who have used it claimed that it was great. AWS Fargate received a general rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars. The ease of use, the fact that Fargate removes server reliance, and useful deployment of applications are among benefits. Developers have also noted that AWS Fargate is more secure, because of the ability to embed security within each container.

Another reviewer calls AWS Fargate an excellent solution: “I have been working with AWS Fargate for 1 or 2 years, and as a cloud architect it’s a boon for me...  It becomes so easy to scale up and scale down dynamically when you’re using AWS Fargate.”

Despite these advantages, AWS Fargate customers do have some complaints:

  • One user wishes that the learning curve was easier, writing that “it requires some amount of experience on Amazon EC2 and knowledge of some services.”
  • Multiple users mention that the cost of AWS Fargate is too high for them: “AWS Fargate is costlier when compared with other services”; “the pricing isn't great and didn't fit our startup’s needs.”
  • Finally, another user has issues with Amazon’s support: “as it's a new product introduced in 2017, the quality of support is not so good.”
blank Serverless Tools

Speak to us to learn how IronWorker and IronMQ are essential products for your application to become cloud elastic.

What People Like Best About AWS Fargate

Some of the things that people really like about AWS Fargate include:

  • You don’t need any servers or infrastructure to launch your containers
  • Increased ability to speed up the deployment of applications
  • Enhanced security
  • Allows you to focus on building the application
  • Don't need to manage a cluster of Amazon EC2 instances
  • Alternative to Amazon Elastic Container Service ECS (AWS ECS) or EKS

The main benefit of AWS Fargate is that you do not have to own any infrastructure to manage your container. This means that any developer can use AWS Fargate and you do not buy any servers. Companies in the technology industry are also able to speed up the production process for of all their applications. AWS Fargate is a good infrastructure management service for dynamically scaling up or down container workloads.

AWS Fargate also comes with an existing ECS. This makes the process of building applications much easier. You can separate the application from the underlying resources. This helps the application become more secure and speeds up the application deployment process.

AWS Fargate allows you to remain completely focused on the designing and building of applications. This makes the whole process much easier and more efficient. The user interface of AWS Fargate is quite simple which makes it easier to navigate.



What People Dislike About AWS Fargate

Some of the things that people dislike about AWS Fargate are:

  • Higher charges
  • Compatibility issues
  • AWS Fargate is complex and difficult to operate
  • Limited storage for containers
  • Limited regional availability

The main downside of AWS Fargate is that it is more expensive than other services. That's the case in the short term, and also in the long run when you do not have your servers. AWS Fargate users also pay higher fees per hour than Amazon ECS and EKS users. Many technology startup companies are thus unable to afford AWS Fargate.

The other downside of AWS Fargate is its incompatibility with other types of technologies such as EFS. Some users have also noticed that using AWS Fargate requires some experience and basic knowledge about certain services. As a result, it may not be universally accessible to a wide network of users.

There is also limited storage for containers. You can overcome this challenge by mounting an Elastic File System (EFS) into the AWS Fargate container. However, this makes AWS Fargate more expensive than regular EBS volumes. Currently, such volumes are not supported by AWS Fargate. Users also noted that the quality of support for AWS Fargate is not great.

Because you don't manage any of the underlying infrastructures, it is impossible to choose an operating system for the application. This becomes a big disadvantage for companies that run and manage sensitive applications.

AWS Fargate is available regionally. But the service is trying to roll out countrywide. Currently, the service is not available in places such as Northern California, Paris, Mumbai, Beijing, London, Stockholm, and Montreal.


IronWorker: The AWS Fargate Alternative

Some of the benefits of IronWorker, compared to AWS Fargate, include:

  • Great concurrency features to scheduled task execution
  • Easy to scale, easy to set up and very reliable
  • The hybrid service helps the user have greater control
  • Simple to deploy new instances with one command

The three main advantages of IronWorker over AWS Fargate are simplicity, support, and more deployment options. Choose a management service based on your resources, deployment needs, and client satisfaction goals. This will help you minimize costs and maximize efficiency.

Looking for more content centered around AWS fargate? Take a look at these other posts below.

Unlock the Cloud with

Find out how IronWorker and IronMQ can help your application obtain the cloud with fanatical customer support, reliable performance, and competitive pricing.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.