<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OpenShift Archives - The Iron.io Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.iron.io/tag/openshift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.iron.io/tag/openshift/</link>
	<description>Scalable serverless application tools to run background tasks with Docker containers and manage messaging queues with cloud elasticity and handheld customer support.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform</title>
		<link>https://blog.iron.io/aws-fargate-vs-openshift-container-platform/</link>
					<comments>https://blog.iron.io/aws-fargate-vs-openshift-container-platform/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 05:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Serverless Workers & Containers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWS Fargate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IronWorker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenShift]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.iron.io/?p=7362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>vs Introduction Critical differences between AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform: AWS Fargate only works with AWS cloud services, while OpenShift has more collaboration options. OpenShift is an open-source solution while AWS Fargate keeps its coding secret. AWS Fargate is only available in select regions, while OpenShift Container Platform can operate anywhere. AWS Fargate and&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blog.iron.io/aws-fargate-vs-openshift-container-platform/">AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blog.iron.io">The Iron.io Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.iron.io/aws-fargate-vs-openshift-container-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delivering on the Promise of Multicloud Lambda-like Functionality</title>
		<link>https://blog.iron.io/delivering-on-the-promise-of-multicloud-lambda-like-functionality/</link>
					<comments>https://blog.iron.io/delivering-on-the-promise-of-multicloud-lambda-like-functionality/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Serverless News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWS Lambda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Foundry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenShift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenStack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.iron.io/?p=6604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In February, we launch a beta called Project Kratos. It promised to bring Lambda-like functionality to any cloud – public, private, hybrid or on-premises. As we quickly approach Q4, February seems like a long time ago, but so much has happened since then. Over the past seven months, serverless computing has gained momentum as more&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blog.iron.io/delivering-on-the-promise-of-multicloud-lambda-like-functionality/">Delivering on the Promise of Multicloud Lambda-like Functionality</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blog.iron.io">The Iron.io Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.iron.io/delivering-on-the-promise-of-multicloud-lambda-like-functionality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenShift Ecosystem: Iron.io Brings a Serverless Experience to OpenShift</title>
		<link>https://blog.iron.io/openshift-ecosystem-iron-io-brings-a-serverless-experience-to-openshift/</link>
					<comments>https://blog.iron.io/openshift-ecosystem-iron-io-brings-a-serverless-experience-to-openshift/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 23:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Integrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IronMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenShift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serverless]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.iron.io/?p=6336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There has been a lot of buzz around the Serverless trend lately; what it really means and what are its merits. At the end of the day it’s really just a new way to treat certain workloads – background jobs. How does this new pattern fit in the context of developing cloud native applications and&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blog.iron.io/openshift-ecosystem-iron-io-brings-a-serverless-experience-to-openshift/">OpenShift Ecosystem: Iron.io Brings a Serverless Experience to OpenShift</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blog.iron.io">The Iron.io Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.iron.io/openshift-ecosystem-iron-io-brings-a-serverless-experience-to-openshift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Need a Mobile Backend? Try OpenShift. (SendGrid article)</title>
		<link>https://blog.iron.io/need-mobile-backend-try-openshift/</link>
					<comments>https://blog.iron.io/need-mobile-backend-try-openshift/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Serverless News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IronMQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenShift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SendGrid]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ironio2.wpengine.com/?p=62</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SendGrid on Mobile Backend Services SendGrid put out a nice post on their blog the other day on what to look for with mobile backends. Kunal Batra is a developer evangelist at-large for SendGrid and did some work with Redhat’s OpenShift platform recently. In the post, Kunal lays out a simple case for why this platform&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blog.iron.io/need-mobile-backend-try-openshift/">Need a Mobile Backend? Try OpenShift. (SendGrid article)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blog.iron.io">The Iron.io Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.iron.io/need-mobile-backend-try-openshift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
