Critical differences between AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform:
- AWS Fargate only works with AWS cloud services, while OpenShift has more collaboration options.
- OpenShift is an open-source solution while AWS Fargate keeps its coding secret.
- AWS Fargate is only available in select regions, while OpenShift Container Platform can operate anywhere.
AWS Fargate and OpenShift Container Platform are serverless container managers that can help companies develop effective applications. If you don’t know the differences between them, though, you can’t make an informed choice. The following AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform should help you start your comparison.
Table of Contents
- What Is AWS Fargate?
- What Is OpenShift Container Platform?
- AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform: Top Features
- AWS Fargate: Pros and Cons
- OpenShift Container Platform: Pros and Cons
- AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform: User Reviews
- Alternatives to AWS Fargate and OpenShift Container Platform
Achieve Cloud Elasticity with Iron
Schedule a call to learn why you can do more with IronWorker compared to AWS Fargate and OpenShift Container Platform
What Is AWS Fargate?
AWS Fargate is a serverless manager for containers. As a serverless solution, developers and admins do not need to spend time choosing server types or setting access rules. (Serverless, of course, does not mean that AWS Fargate does not use servers. It simply means that users do not need to concern themselves with servers because AWS Fargate performs that service for them).
The serverless option makes it easier for users to allocate resources to containers instead of dedicating time to the underlying infrastructure. This helps ensure that applications run as expected on a variety of platforms.
What Is OpenShift Container Platform?
OpenShift Container Platform is also a serverless container management platform. Red Hat developed OpenShift to accelerate applications in a variety of environments, including hybrid cloud environments.
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform can operate independently on a dedicated server, but the company also built versions that work in coordination with IBM Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and other cloud providers. This level of flexibility makes it appealing to many enterprise users who don’t want to abandon ongoing relationships with other companies.
AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform: Top Features
Although AWS Fargate and OpenShift Container Platform largely perform the same tasks, each has unique features that may make one more attractive than the other to certain users.
Some of the features potential users should know about AWS Fargate include:
- Its ability to work quickly in the AWS cloud. (Fargate actually works well with the entire AWS ecosystem. Unfortunately, it cannot run on the private cloud. If you try to leave AWS, you will have problems with Fargate.)
- The option to launch tens of thousands of containers within seconds, which many enterprise users will find useful at certain times.
- Its ability to scale quickly when users need to launch more applications in a short time.
Red Shift’s developers give OpenShift Container Platform slightly different features that make it stand out as a strong option. In fact, some of its best features stand in opposition to those from AWS Fargate.
People who prefer OpenShift vs Fargate often point to features like:
- The flexibility to work on numerous cloud platforms, including hybrid and private cloud servers. This feature gives users more control because they can continue using their current cloud services or reconsider their strategy to adopt a more robust option with a lower cost.
- A user experience dashboard that makes it easy for new users to accomplish basic tasks after a relatively short learning curve. More advanced features, however, do take longer to master.
- Multiple language support that lets companies develop applications for clients all over the world.
Overall, AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform could meet your organization’s needs. It just depends on the level of flexibility that you want and whether you prefer using tools outside of the AWS ecosystem.
AWS Fargate: Pros and Cons
Having a short list of AWS Fargate’s pros and cons can make it much easier for you to determine whether you want to learn more about the serverless container solution.
Advantages of choosing AWS Fargate:
- It coordinates extremely well with other solutions in the AWS ecosystem.
- Potentially lower costs when you pay close attention to how and when you use Farfate (this depends on several factors, including which solutions you compare it to).
- AWK Fargate embeds security in its IT infrastructure, so users don’t need to spend as much money or time addressing security issues.
Disadvantages of choosing AWS Fargate:
- It does not work on cloud providers other than AWS.
- Although Amazon is working to expand Fargate’s reach, it isn’t available worldwide. Fargate is not available in major economic areas like Montreal, Hong Kong, Osaka, Paris, London, Montreal, Cape Town, Seoul, Beijing, and even Northern California.
- Fargate often has higher costs than similar solutions, even though it only charges for the services that you use.
Iron.io Serverless Tools
Speak to us to learn how IronWorker and IronMQ are essential products for your application to become cloud elastic.
OpenShift Container Platform: Pros and Cons
OpenShift Container Platform operates as one of AWS Fargate’s competitors, so the product needs to excel in areas where Fargate fails. At times, Red Hat’s solution has been successful. At other times, it hasn’t met that need as well as expected.
Some advantages of choosing OpenShift Container Platform include:
- Excellent flexibility that lets developers decide which other tools and cloud providers meet their needs best while using OpenShift.
- OpenShift doesn’t have a vendor lock-in, which makes it even easier for companies to explore their options. If you find a cloud service provider that works better than your current one, you can switch without much delay.
- OpenShift is an open-source platform that makes it easier and faster for experienced developers to get the specific features that they need to take their products to the market as soon as possible.
OpenShift does have a few disadvantages that might affect some people. For example, OpenShift:
- Has strict security policies that can make it difficult for teams to do things like rubbing a container as a root. Inexperienced developers will find this helpful. Those who want more control will likely feel frustrated.
- The templates that come with OpenShift aren’t as flexible as those from similar solutions. While you will not notice a difference between Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform, people experienced with options like Kubernetes Helm may wonder why the restrictions exist.
AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform: User Reviews
AWS Fargate users who write reviews on G2 give the platform 4.5 out of 5 stars. Some of their comments include:
- “The primary complaint that you will see people have is lack of persistent storage with AWS Fargate.”
- “We need to replace AWS Fargate for AWS Batch due to compatibility of Fargate to attach EFS to containers.”
- “The best thing about Fargate is that you can just start out of the gate without setting up servers.”
OpenShift Container Platform earns 4.4 out of 5 stars from users who post reviews on G2. Some of their reviews include:
- “Broad set of peripheral tools for Monitoring and CI/CD Pipelining.”
- “I like the ease of use, flexibility, security and gul features like reviewing logs and accessing shell from the console.”
- I don’t like “lack of documentation in certain aspects such as the relaxing of certain security enforcements.”
Alternatives to AWS Fargate and OpenShift Container Platform
If AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform leaves you wishing that you had a better option, now is a good time to consider IronWorker. IronWorker is an extremely flexible solution that lets you run applications on any public, private, or on-premises cloud.
Other benefits of IronWorker include:
- Straightforward pricing.
- Serverless computing that scales up or down quickly.,
- Excellent security features.
- Full GPU support.
- Custom-built solutions for your organization.
Unlock the Cloud with Iron.io
Sign up for a free trial to see how well IronWorker matches your needs. You don’t need to provide a credit card number, so you don’t have to worry about getting locked into a deal you don’t want.