AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform

What Is AWS Fargate?

AWS Fargate is a serverless manager for containers. As a serverless solution, developers and admins do not need to spend time choosing server types or setting access rules. (Serverless, of course, does not mean that AWS Fargate does not use servers. It simply means that users do not need to concern themselves with servers because AWS Fargate performs that service for them).

The serverless option makes it easier for users to allocate resources to containers instead of dedicating time to the underlying infrastructure. This helps ensure that applications run as expected on a variety of platforms.

What Is OpenShift Container Platform?

OpenShift Container Platform is also a serverless container management platform. Red Hat developed OpenShift to accelerate applications in a variety of environments, including hybrid cloud environments.

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform can operate independently on a dedicated server, but the company also built versions that work in coordination with IBM Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and other cloud providers. This level of flexibility makes it appealing to many enterprise users who don’t want to abandon ongoing relationships with other companies.

AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform: Top Features

Although AWS Fargate and OpenShift Container Platform largely perform the same tasks, each has unique features that may make one more attractive than the other to certain users.

Some of the features potential users should know about AWS Fargate include:

• Its ability to work quickly in the AWS cloud. (Fargate actually works well with the entire AWS ecosystem. Unfortunately, it cannot run on the private cloud. If you try to leave AWS, you will have problems with Fargate.)
• The option to launch tens of thousands of containers within seconds, which many enterprise users will find useful at certain times.
• Its ability to scale quickly when users need to launch more applications in a short time.

Red Shift’s developers give OpenShift Container Platform slightly different features that make it stand out as a strong option. In fact, some of its best features stand in opposition to those from AWS Fargate.

People who prefer OpenShift vs Fargate often point to features like:

• The flexibility to work on numerous cloud platforms, including hybrid and private cloud servers. This feature gives users more control because they can continue using their current cloud services or reconsider their strategy to adopt a more robust option with a lower cost.
• A user experience dashboard that makes it easy for new users to accomplish basic tasks after a relatively short learning curve. More advanced features, however, do take longer to master.
• Multiple language support that lets companies develop applications for clients all over the world.

Overall, AWS Fargate vs OpenShift Container Platform could meet your organization’s needs. It just depends on the level of flexibility that you want and whether you prefer using tools outside of the AWS ecosystem.

AWS Fargate: Pros and Cons

Having a short list of AWS Fargate’s pros and cons can make it much easier for you to determine whether you want to learn more about the serverless container solution.

Advantages of choosing AWS Fargate:

• It coordinates extremely well with other solutions in the AWS ecosystem.
• Potentially lower costs when you pay close attention to how and when you use Farfate (this depends on several factors, including which solutions you compare it to).
• AWK Fargate embeds security in its IT infrastructure, so users don’t need to spend as much money or time addressing security issues.

Disadvantages of choosing AWS Fargate:

• It does not work on cloud providers other than AWS.
• Although Amazon is working to expand Fargate’s reach, it isn’t available worldwide. Fargate is not available in major economic areas like Montreal, Hong Kong, Osaka, Paris, London, Montreal, Cape Town, Seoul, Beijing, and even Northern California.
• Fargate often has higher costs than similar solutions, even though it only charges for the services that you use.