- Architecture: IronWorker is a hosted job processing solution that lets you manage container-based workloads. Dynos are isolated Linux containers in Salesforce Heroku that facilitate code based on various commands.
- Purpose: Use dynos to execute code for specific commands. Use IronWorker to manage and schedule these containers.
- Scalability: Both IronWorker and dynos scale but in different ways. IronWorker scales to handle your workload as you send it to the platform. Dynos scale horizontally.
- Price: Each dyno costs from $25-50 per month. (Plus $3 extra per month for scheduling.) IronWorker is cheaper, starting from $24 per month.
- Reviews: IronWorker has an average rating of 4.6/5 on the software review website G2.com. Heroku has a lower score (4.3/5).
Data-driven businesses need to sequence, queue, and schedule jobs in public and private cloud environments for all kinds of reasons. So a hosted job processing solution like IronWorker simplifies the entire process. These businesses also need to execute code in containers based on specific commands. That is where dynos prove useful.
As you can see, IronWorker and dynos are two completely different concepts, and it's difficult to make a like-for-like comparison. But it's important to know the difference because IronWorker and dynos co-exist in container management. In this review, we compare IronWorker vs. dynos on features, prices, capabilities, and more.
Achieve Cloud Elasticity with Iron
IronWorker lets you manage containers without breaking a sweat. Speak to us to find how you can achieve cloud elasticity with a serverless messaging queue and background task solution with free handeld support.
Comparing IronWorker vs. Dynos
It's not possible to compare IronWorker and dynos because they serve different functions:
- IronWorker is a container-based work-on-demand solution that's built on top of the Docker container format. Use it to manage and schedule contained-based workflows via the cloud.
- Dynos are containers, so you could use a platform like IronWorker to manage and schedule them. You find dynos in Heroku.
Most people schedule dynos in Heroku, but using something like IronWorker could prove more effective. That is because Heroku has limited capabilities and supports just two scheduling options: You can schedule via the Chron add-on once an hour or once a day. (There are no options for one-time runs or specific schedules — twice a day, three times a week, twice a month, etc.) These limited schedule options won't suit growing businesses that rely on job processing to expedite day-to-day tasks.
Scheduling dynos in Heroku might be limited, but the platform itself is reliable and executes tasks quickly. IronWorker is just as solid, boasting impressive features like push notifications for scheduling tasks, ETL processing, chron replacement, and image and video processing. The platform exists in a RESTful HTTP-based API.
Some of the world's biggest companies use Heroku, including StackShare and Accenture. Companies like CNN and Coinbase use IronWorker.
IronWorker vs. Dynos: Pricing
Each dyno costs $25-50 per month on Heroku's standard plan. That includes simple horizontal scalability, app metrics, and unlimited background workers. But that doesn't include scheduling.
IronWorker costs $24 per month, making it the cheaper out of the two. You can sign up for a free trial without using a credit card.
Iron.io Serverless Tools
Speak to us to learn how IronWorker is an essential product for your application to become cloud elastic.
IronWorker has an average user score of 4.6/5 on the website GetApp, based on 10 reviews. (Correct as of December 2020.)
One user says:
"We used it as a one-stop-shop to help us get onto the cloud and tune our services to get cloud efficiencies. It was overwhelming looking at the many disparate services that need to have the dots connected to get underway with the cloud, so giving this problem to Iron made things much easier as we had a single touchpoint."
Another user says:
"I love that IronWorker supports PHP. natively. Also, the scheduler is a great feature. It Makes it easy to run PHP functions in the cloud without having to provision servers or containers."
Heroku has a score of 4.3/5 on G2.com, based on 88 reviews. (Correct as of December 2020.) There are no specific reviews for dynos.
One user says:
"There are a lot of cloud-based platforms for rapid deployment now, and Heroku's feature set is as robust as any of them."
Another user says:
"What I like the most is the ease of configuration and deployment of applications."
IronWorker and dynos are two different concepts, so it's difficult to compare them. Heroku, where you find dynos, provides similar scheduling services as IronWorker, but, again, the two platforms are different. We recommend scheduling in IronWorker because it provides more flexibility than scheduling dynos in Heroku. IronWorker also works out cheaper and offers excellent customer service with fast response times for all users.
Do you want to optimize container management in your organization?
Find out how IronWorker can help your application obtain the cloud with fanatical customer support, reliable performance, and competitive pricing.